Women and Islam in Pre nineteenth Century Aceh

Ma. Theresa R. Milallos, a Lee Kong Chian Research Fellow, explores how gender relations in Aceh have changed and continue to be transformed by the dynamism of Islam’s interpretation in Aceh.

Introduction

The discourse on gender in Aceh has always been a site of tension. This paper seeks to understand how gender relations have changed and continue to be transformed by the dynamism of Islam’s interpretation in Aceh. Considerable research¹ has already shown that women in Southeast Asia, including those in Aceh, enjoyed a higher level of economic autonomy and personal freedom prior to the colonisation period compared to those from West, East and South Asia. After the December 2004 tsunami however the discourse included how women may have been responsible for the disaster,² and consequently how they should be controlled. How is it possible to rationalise these seemingly incongruent facts? In what ways and to what extent can this ‘high status’ of women be observed in Aceh historically and at present?

Transition to Islam in Aceh in the Early Modern Period

While the exact period of Islam’s entry into Aceh is highly contested,³ recent discoveries of tombstones in Kuta Lubhok, Aceh Besar district give evidence of a Muslim community as early as the 12th century (McKinnon, 2006, pp. 30–32). The initial stage in this expansion and adoption process had been marked by intense interaction between Islam and local belief systems, culminating in the wujuddiyah doctrine of Hamzah and Shamsuddin made popular during the reign of the great Iskandar Muda. Here, Islam provided a powerful rationale for state-building under the authority of a mortal, but Godendowed, sultan. When Iskandar Muda⁴ died however what followed was a tumultuous era of Islamic renewal and reformism. Aceh as a sultanate under the reign of Iskandar Thani was by then already a consolidated empire that had nothing more to prove. The entry and popularity of a more legalistic and scriptural brand of Islam promoted by Nur al-Din ar-Raniri⁵ exhibited a more ‘modern’ and innovative sultanate, one that was increasingly intolerant of local influences, and more importantly had the end-view of pacifying the numerous and increasingly powerful foreign Muslim traders in Aceh (Reid, personal communication, 5/09/2008). The culmination of this stage was a ‘fierce heresy-hunt’ led by ar-Raniri against the wujuddiyah doctrine (Ito 1979).

By the 17th century, Aceh’s power was waning. The sultanate was shrinking fast following the loss of many of its territories and the weakening of trade in its ports. Traditional power had shifted away from the sultan into the hands of orang kayas, who subsequently put four queens on the throne from 1641 to 1699 (Reid, 2005, p. 94–111).⁶

By 1675, with the death of Safiyyat al-Din, the first of Aceh’s queens, the sultanate was confined only to north Sumatra (Djajadiningrat, 1979, p. 62). A more tolerant Islam, advocated by Abd al-Rauf alSinkili who had supplanted the increasingly unpopular ar-Raniri who had begun to lose favour with the court, characterised the long reign of the four queens. This period was marked by a return to ‘syncretism and inclusiveness’, however with adat gaining more ground in the countryside (Reid, personal communication, 5/09/2008).⁷

These ‘waves’ of Islamic adoption, reformism, and renewal had profound consequences to gender relations in pre-19th century Aceh. They raise some pertinent questions: to what extent had Islam become entrenched in the Acehnese sultanate during the early modern period, and to what degree was Islamic law actually observed? Which segments of the population fell squarely within the ambit of Islamic piety and practice during this time? Answers to these questions will hopefully clarify what it means for women during this period to enjoy ‘high status.’

Patterns in the Adoption of Islam and Their Consequences to Gender Relations

Following the patterns of intensification and weakening of Islamic influence in Aceh, it is not surprising to encounter observations like those made by Francois Martin, who wrote in 1602 of women who could walk about openly with breasts exposed, or had ears adorned, heads uncovered, and who were even able to bathe naked in the river without fear of being accosted. Adultery received a high penalty — execution or the cutting off of body parts. By 1621, Augustin de Beaulieu noted that caning, a ubiquitous Islamic practice, was also a popular way to administer punishment (Reid (Ed.), 1995, pp. 57–60 & 66–67). Yet, Martin also recorded that sexual promiscuity appeared to have been acceptable in the early 17th century (Reid (Ed.) 1995, p. 58). This was corroborated in the 19th century by Hurgronje, who, even while stressing the social importance of a bride’s virginity before marriage, also noted that there existed “comparative freedom of intercourse between the sexes in Aceh” (1906, pp. 328–346).

The early to mid-17th century was characterised by behaviours that may not have been acceptable to a more legalistic and scriptural interpretation of Islam. There prevailed a relatively permissive environment where ‘hermaphrodites’ abounded and prostitution was tolerated. The king of Aceh could keep more than 300 concubines, and women could literally venture into the masculine ‘outside’ world of commerce and trade. This kind of behaviour was not condoned among the elite classes, however, as notions of morality in their circles would certainly have been much higher.

Regarding the issue of female concealment, contemporary debate has been rife as to whether it is a traditional, and therefore ‘indigenous’, practice.⁸ In many areas in Southeast Asia since the 16th century, the evolution of sovereign states and the economic gains from trade had produced increasingly stratified social structures. In 1602, for instance, the orang kayas in Aceh began to sport long fingernails on the thumb and little finger, a sign that they did not need to do work by hand (Lombard, 1991, p. 58). Their women, in turn, were also freed from labour, removed from the ”sexually dangerous and aggressively masculine ’outside’”, and thus concealed from the public gaze (Andaya, 2000, p. 241).

In Aceh, female concealment appears to have acquired a mystical quality during the era of the four queens (c. 641–1699). While Aceh is not unique in having placed four queens on the throne,⁹ it appears to be the only sultanate that had strict requirements for a queen to be “a maiden, advanced in years, and connected by royal blood with the ancient royal line” (see Marsden, 1986, p. 453–454). Unlike Hindu Java in the early 16th century, which Pires observed had numerous unmarried women (1944, p. 177), Aceh certainly did not have a comparable traditional regard for maidens who did not marry (Hurgronje, 1906, pp. 295, 343).

As in many Muslim societies, the notion of ‘outside’ (keluar) versus ‘inside’ (dalam) to delineate masculine and feminine spheres of activity appears to have been influenced to a large degree by the principles of Islam. Andaya (2000, pp. 231–253) has argued that the higher the social class of a woman and her family, the higher the societal constraints placed on her to withdraw from the ‘outside’. As monarchs, however, the queens straddled both the ‘outside’ world of politics traditionally occupied by men, and the ‘inside’ world of mysticism and the home allotted to the female. While women could never be caliphs (the Prophet’s deputy as the Messenger of God) because they belonged to the wrong sex (Mernissi, 1994), conditions of emergency may warrant their political ascendancy. In such circumstances, seclusion acts to balance the already dangerous situation of crisis, which precipitated female ascendancy in the first place. Indeed, this ‘asexualisation’, or the process by which one is rendered virtually sexless, is heightened by the insistence on a queen being an ‘old maid,’ the life stage when a woman is often regarded as least desirable. Having passed the child-bearing stage, she is also considered to be wiser and “gender neutral” (Andaya, 2000, p. 236). At the same time, because royal power is held as highly masculine, these queens maintained large harems, like their male counterparts (Andaya, 2000, p. 244). For a male monarch, the possession of a large harem was obviously a symbol of prestige and potency.¹⁰ A sexless and undesirable female monarch, therefore, assumes mystical power through the display of a large retinue of women under her protection.

These notions about female power however were never static; they signalled the foregoing ideologies of the time. The deposition of sultana Kamalat Syah at the end of the 17th century due to a fatwa from the Chief Qadi of Mecca, for example, is very much reflective of the waves of Islamic reformism and renewal and the religious turmoil sweeping across Aceh.

One other issue complicated by gender is that of inheritance, which highlights the tension between Islam and adat. Beaulieu in 1621 noted that, “The king is heir to all his subjects if they have no male children.” Thus, among the aristocracy, having a son appears to have been critical to ensure that wealth does not revert to the sultan upon the family patriarch’s death, as a “father cannot bequeath any inheritance to his daughter” (Reid (Ed.), 1995, p. 70). While such an observation may have been applicable only during particular reigns of despotic rulers such as al-Mukammil and Iskandar Muda, it is still markedly different from the adat custom characteristic of Aceh, where parents pass on house and rice lands to their daughters. In the late 19th century for instance, Hurgronje (1906) observed that the pattern of inheritance regarding immovable property was through daughters.

On the matter of polygamy as sanctioned by Islam, it is commonly the upper classes, notably the aristocracy, royalty and state officials, who practiced numerous marriages, while the common man married a second wife only when he was divorced or widowed (see Hoesin, 1970, p. 56–57). When polygamy did occur, the man must give some of his property as inheritance to the new (and usually younger) wife in order to convince her parents to agree to the second (or third) union (see Lombard, 1991, p. 70).

The debate on adat and Islam has focused on the harmony and tension between the two, the alleged misogyny of Islam, and the bilaterality purportedly inherent in adat.¹¹ While 17th century Aceh did not yet have a tradition of codified laws as sophisticated as that which existed in 15th-century Melaka¹² (Hadi, 2004, p. 217), adat has been observed to govern the system of landholding and inheritance. However, unlike the development of adat in other areas of maritime Southeast Asia, adat Aceh has allegedly been imposed by the rulers rather than originating from the people themselves (Riddell, 2006). Both the village head (keucik) and the hereditary district chief (uleebalang) adjudicated using adat, while the ulama administered Islamic law when appropriate (Reid, 2006a, p. 9). Consequently, the tension between the two systems is not just theoretical or ideological in nature, but rather, strikes deeply at the core of their rationale. Such a consideration has implications on what ‘indigenous’ practices and laws mean vis-a-vis what are alien to the society, and more importantly, on how ‘Acehneseness’ may be defined (Reid, 2006a, p. 9).

As for their impact on women, Wazir (1992) believes that the major difference between adat and Islam is that generally the former provides the basis for women’s power and autonomy, while the latter supports male power. The ”overall pervasive norm of ‘bilaterality’” (Wazir, 1992, p. 5) endowed in adat is most obvious in matters relating to land, economics, kinship and marriage, which reduces hierarchical differences based on gender. Thus, young unmarried women may be marginalised just as much as young unmarried men because of age, marital status and class, rather than simply on the basis of biology or sex (Wazir, 1992, p. 10).

Female Roles in Pre-Nineteenth Century Aceh

The diversity of female roles in pre-19th century Aceh reflects the relatively active participation of women in society. Andaya (2006, p. 48) emphasised the role of wives and even concubines, not only in perpetuating royal bloodlines, but also in legitimating rule and brokering peace through intermarriages.¹³ Unlike Melaka, however, where the wives of sultans were clearly supplied by the bendaraha line (Wazir, 1992, pp. 38–43), there is no clear indication about the origins of royal wives and even concubines in Aceh. Nonetheless, women’s involvement in palace intrigues, rebellions and conspiracies have been numerous. The queens themselves are far from being mere figureheads. Indeed, the longevity of the reigns of the queens (Safiyyat al-Din ruled for 35 years, and both Zakiyyat al-Din and Kamalat Syah for 11 years each), with the exception of Nakiat adDin (1676–8), is comparable to the long reigns of earlier Acehnese sultans (see Adat Aceh, 1958).

Like other kings in Southeast Asia, notably Sultan Agung of Mataram and the king of Angkor, the sultans of Aceh have followed the practice of surrounding themselves with many women (Reid, 1988, p. 637). These women have played the roles of royal entertainers who were ”not usually seene of any but such as the king will greatly honour” (Foster, 1940, p. 93, 131), “ambassadors of goodwill”,¹⁴ and guards. Women guards and attendants certainly enjoyed a reputation as being more loyal and trustworthy than men, and less likely to conspire against the king. Some sultans also observed the practice of giving away these women as ‘partners’ to their favourite allies.¹⁵

Other sources of income for women came from being moneychangers and funeral ‘criers’. From Francois Martin, we learn that some women were hired to weep and grieve at funerals (see Reid (Ed.), 1995, p. 61). In addition, similar to accounts documented in places such as early Pasai, Cambodia, Siam, Cochin China, the Moluccas, and Melaka, women in the urban areas of pre-19th century Aceh ruled the markets (Reid, 1988, p. 634). Although there is a dearth of materials that address directly the role of women in the context of early modern markets, observations made by William Dampier in 1688–9 give anecdotal evidence of their involvement in the economic life of the sultanate.¹⁶ Along the streets of Aceh, women ‘money changers’ sat and hawked cash. However, as most of them were slaves, these women were not entitled to keep any of the money traded.

In 17th century Aceh, slaves comprised those who were either too poor, or those who were brought back to Aceh as war booties. Being a slave, however, did not mean total bondage to the owner (Reid (Ed.). 1995, p. 114). A slave can theoretically pay off his bondage, otherwise whatever he owned reverted to his master upon death. However, it is unclear whether a woman bonded for labour can seek to redeem her freedom the same way as a man. The Undang-Undang Melaka (Liaw, 1976), on the other hand, is clear: the debtor can only be a man, and his onerous debt responsibilities did not extend to his wife and children if he dies. Adat Aceh demands that children borne of female slaves had the same rights as those of free women (Hoesin, 1970, pp. 51–52). In contrast to Islamic law, which considers the children of female slaves as slaves themselves, adat Aceh treats them as free. However, their names bear reminders of their shackled origins, and are dropped only after a generation or two later (Hurgronje, 1906, p. 22).

The ‘High-Status’ of Women

While it is certainly difficult to view women as one cohesive group in pre-19th century Aceh, it is very clear that those born into a higher class family enjoyed greater social status than lower-ranked men, both in terms of material wealth and social prestige (Errington, 1990, p. 7). However, high-born women had more social constraints placed upon them than low-born men or women. The waves of Islamic adoption, interpretation and implementation, as well as the historical processes that occurred during specific periods, resulted in a continuous process of clarifying social expectations, behaviours, and even aspirations among different groups of women bound together within particular social classes. Thus, in this sense, social ‘status’ as indirectly rationalised and supported by the different interpretations of Islam throughout Aceh’s history appears to have been a double-edged blade for women.

Reid (1993, pp. 71–72, 74) estimates the city population in 17th century Aceh to be at least 100,000, with the urban area measuring approximately 12km2. If we consider this number conservatively, given that the sultan’s palace itself housed at least 3,000 women (certainly during Sultan Iskandar Muda’s reign), we could suppose that the direct impact of Islam would be highest on those who lived in the palace or the walled area, next among those residing within the general urban areas, and weakest in the rural or marginalised areas.

What is clear regarding gender relations in pre-19th century Aceh is that the advancement of urbanisation and modernisation brought with them concomitant social changes. That women actively participated in these changes is unquestionable. Bound within the expectations, constraints and opportunities accruing from their particular social classes, women are shown to have contributed to and gained from the perpetuation of prevailing social conditions.

Conclusion

Pre-19th century women in the Islamic sultanate of Aceh were certainly products of their specific time periods and circumstances. Although they did not necessarily experience either complete equality or inequality with men, they did enjoy relative economic leverage and self-autonomy that enabled them to live fairly independent lives. Of course, this statement has to be tempered by the fact that as the sultanate was progressing to become a highly stratified urban area, women from different classes enjoyed varying degrees of ‘high status’. In addition, it is true that throughout cycles of social adoption and interpretations of Islam, social expectations also encounter change, to reflect prevailing notions. These changes, in large part, have contributed to the ambiguity inherent in Acehnese gender relations, which manifests until today.

Islam is shown to have flourished in Aceh’s urban areas. Thus, it is not surprising that the most ‘devout’ are to be found in urban areas, where historical processes involving key figures emerged first, with consequences that subsequently reverberated to the rest of society. In contemporary Aceh, the use of the jilbab is ubiquitous in the cities, notably Banda Aceh, rather than in the more remote interior regions. In relation to the delineation between masculine and feminine roles, this would not necessarily have been a problem in areas where the need for labour was critical, regardless of gender.¹⁷ In urban areas where social status and class freed some segments of the population from manual labour, gender differentiation became more stringent. Thus, it is not surprising to learn that community members and religious leaders around urban areas are the ones who generally blamed women for the 2004 tsunami.¹⁸ After all, urban areas are fertile ground for both devotion and decadence, and the processes that start in the center typically lose intensity as they spread outward. Women themselves have been shown to actively support these discourses and ensure that social norms are followed. From the 16th to 17th centuries when Aceh emerged as an Islamic state, women were actively involved in the processes of social and political change. Far from being mere pawns in the life of the sultanate, they had contributed to the perpetuation and development of social expectations between men and themselves. It remains to be seen where these conflicting and ambiguous discourse on gender lead, and how Aceh today is able to balance Islam and societal expectations.

The author wishes to acknowledge the contributions of Professor Anthony Reid, Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore in reviewing the paper.

REFERENCES

Adat Atjeeh: Reproduced in Facsimile From a Manuscript in the India Office Library (‘s-Gravenhage, Martinus Nijhoff, 1958). (Call no. RCLOS 991 VITLV)

A. H. Johns, “Islam in Southeast Asia: Problems of Perspective,” in Southeast Asian history and historiography, essays presented to D.G.E. Hall, ed. C. D. Cowan and O. W. Wolters (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1976), 304–20. (Call no. RSEA 959 SOU)

Aihwa Ong and Michael G. Peletz, eds., “Introduction,” in Bewitching Women, Pious Men: Gender and Body Politics in Southeast Asia (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), 1–18. (Call no. RSING 305.30959 BEW)

Amirul Hadi, Islam and State in Sumatra: A Study of Seventeenth-Century Aceh (Leiden: Bill, 2004). (Call no. RSEA 322.1095981 HAD)

Anthony Reid, “Female Roles in Pre-Colonial Southeast Asia,” Modern Asian Studies 22, no. 3 (1988), 629–45. (From JSTOR via NLB’s eResources website)

Anthony Reid, ed., “Islamization and Christianization in Southeast Asia: The Critical Phase, 1550–1650,” in Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era: Trade, Power, and Belief (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993), 151–79. (Call no. RSING 959 SOU)

Anthony Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450–1680, vol. two: Expansion and Crisis (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993). (Call no. RSEA 959 REI)

Anthony Reid, ed., Witnesses to Sumatra: A Travellers’ Anthology (Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1995). (Call no. RSEA 915.998104 WIT-[TRA]

Anthony Reid, Charting the Shape of Modern Southeast Asia (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2000). (Call no. RSEA 959 REI)

Anthony Reid, An Indonesian Frontier: Acehnese and Other Histories of Sumatra (Singapore: Singapore University Press, 2005). (Call no. RSEA 959.81 REI)

Anthony Reid, ed., “Introduction,” in Verandah of Violence: The Background to the Aceh Problem (Singapore: Singapore University Press, 2006), 1–21. (Call no. RSING 959.81 VER)

Anthony Reid, ed., “The Pre-Modern Sultanate’s View of Its Place in the World,” in Verandah of Violence: The Background to the Aceh Problem (Singapore: Singapore University Press, 2006), 52–71. (Call no. RSING 959.81 VER)

Anthony Reid, “Introduction,” in Islamic Legitimacy in a Plural Asia, ed. Anthony Reid and Michael Gilsenan (London: Routledge, 2007), 1–13. (Call no. R 297.272095 ISL)

Anzib Lamnyong, “Seri Informasi Aceh Th v No. 2. Dari Satu Manuscript India Office Library,” Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 24 (1981)

Ayse Saktanber, Living Islam: Women, Religion and the Politicization of Culture in Turkey (London: IB Tauris Publishers, 2002)

Azyumardi Azra, The Origins of Islamic Reformism in Southeast Asia: Networks of Malay-Indonesian and Middle Eastern ‘Ulama’ in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (NSW: Asian Studies Association of Australia in association with Allen & Unwin and University of Hawaii Press, 2004). (Call no. RSEA 297.60959 AZR)

Barbara Watson Andaya, “Delineating Female Space: Seclusion and the State in Pre-Modern Island Southeast Asia,” in Other Pasts: Women, Gender and History in Early Modern Southeast Asia (Honolulu: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, 2000), 231–53. (Call no. RUR 305.420959 OTH)

Barbara Watson Andaya, The Flaming Womb: Repositioning Women in Early Modern Southeast Asia (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2006). (Call no. RSEA 305.409590903 AND)

Denys Lombard, Kerajaan Aceh: Jaman Sultan Iskandar Muda (1607–1636), trans. Winarsih Arifin (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1991). (Call no. RSEA 958.8021 LOM)

Edriana Noerdin, “Customary Institutions, Syariah Law and the Marginalization of Indonesian Women,” in Women in Indonesia: Gender, Equity and Development, ed. Kathryn Robinson and Sharon Bessell (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2002), 179–86. (Call no. RSING 305.4209598 WOM)

Edwards E. McKinnon, “Indian and Indonesian Elements in Early North Sumatra,” in Verandah of Violence: The Background to the Aceh Problem, ed. Anthony Reid (Singapore: Singapore University Press, 2006), 22–37. (Call no. RSING 959.81 VER)

Fatima Mernissi, The Forgotten Queens of Islam, trans. Mary Jo Lakeland (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993) (Original work published 1990) (Call no. RUR 920.00917671 MER)

George Coedes, The Indianized States of Southeast Asia, trans. Susan Brown Cowing (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1968). (Call no. RSING 959 COE)

Giovanni Francesco Gemelli Careri, “A Voyage Round the World,” Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 12, no. 2 (119) (August 1934), 94–107. (From JSTOR via NLB’s eResources website)

H. M. Zainuddin, Srikandi Atjeh (Medan: Pustaka Iskandar Muda, 1966)

Jacqueline Aquino Siapno, Gender, Islam, Nationalism and the State in Aceh: The Paradox of Power, Co-Optation and Resistance (London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2002). (Call no. RUR 305.40958 SIA)

James T. Siegel, The Rope of God (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969). (Call no. RUR SEA 301.2095981 SIE)

John Davys, “The Voyages and Works of John Davis, the Navigator,” (New York: Burt Franklin, 1970). (Call no. R 910.45 DAV)

Kamala Chandrakirana and Chuzaifah Yuniyanti, “The Battle Over a “New” Indonesia: Religious Extremism, Democratization and Women’s Agency in a Plural Society,” in Muslim Women and the Challenge of Islamic Extremism, ed. Norani Othman (Kuala Lumpur: Sisters in Islam, 2005), 49–77. (Call no. RSING 305.48697 MUS)

Kenneth Hall, “Economic History of Early Southeast Asia,” in The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, vol. 1: From Early Times to c. 1800, ed. Nicholas Tarling (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 183–272. (Call no. RSING 959 CAM)

Khalid Hussain, Taj Us-Salatin (Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 1966). (Call no. Malay RCLOS 899.2302 TAJ)

Liaw Yock Fang, Undang-Undang Melaka: The Laws of Melaka (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1976). (Call no. RCLOS 340.09595141 LIA)

Linda Rae Bennett, Women, Islam and Modernity: Single Women, Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Contemporary Indonesia (London: Routledge Curzon, 2005). (Call no. RSEA 305.4869709598 BEN)

Lugina Setyawati, “Adat, Islam and Womanhood in the Reconstruction of Riau Malay Identity,” in Indonesian Islam in a New Era: How Women Negotiate Their Muslim Identities, ed. Susan Blackburn, Bianca J. Smith and Siti Syamsiyatun (Clayton: Monash University Press, 2008), 69–93. (Call no. RSEA 305.4869709598 IN)

Ma Huan and Ying-Yai Sheng-Lan, The Overall Survey of the Ocean’s Shores [1433], trans. Feng Chʻeng-Chun (Cambridge: Published for the Hakluyt Society at the University Press, 1970). (Call no. RCLOS 910.8 HAK)

Ma. Theresa R. Milallos, “Muslim Veil As Politics: Political Autonomy, Women and Syariah Islam in Aceh,” Contemporary Islam 1, no. 3 (December 2007)

Masdar F. Masʼudi, Islam and Women’s Reproductive Rights (Malaysia: Sisters in Islam, 1970). (Call no. RSEA 305.48697 MAS)

Michael G. Peletz, Reason and Passion: Representations of Gender in a Malay Society (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996). (Call no. RSEA 305.3095951 PEL)

Moehammad Hoesin, Adat Atjeh (Banda Atjeh: Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudajaan Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Atjeh, 1970). (Call no. RUR 390.095981 HOE)

Nik Noriani Nik Badlishsh, ed., Islamic Family Law and Justice for Muslim Women (Kuala Lumpur: Sisters in Islam, 2003). (Call no. RSEA 346.0150917671 ISL)

Noor Aisha Abdul Rahman, Colonial Image of Malay Adat Laws: A Critical Appraisal of Studies on Adat Laws in the Malay Peninsula During the Colonial Era and Some Continuities (Leiden: Brill, 2006). (Call no. RSEA 340.52595 NOO)

Norani Othman, ed. Muslim Women and the Challenges of Islamic Extremism (Kuala Lumpur: Sisters in Islam, 2005). (Call no. RSING 305.48697 MUS)

Nur al-din al-Raniri, Bustanu’s-Salatin, Bab II, Fasal 13 (Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 1966). (Call no. Malay RSEA 992.1 NUR)

P.A. Leupe, The Siege and Capture of Malacca From the Portuguese in 1640–1641: Extracts From the Archives of the Dutch East India Company, trans. Mac Hacobian (Singapore: Printers Limited, 1936), 128–429. (Call no. RCLOS 959.5118 LEU; microfilm NL1578)

Patricio Cuevas, Still Standing Tall: Addressing Gender Issues in Banda Aceh (Banda Aceh: World Vision Indonesia Tsunami Response, 2006). (Call no. RSING 305.42095981 CUE)

Peter Riddell, “Aceh in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: ’Serambi Mekkah” and Identity,” in Verandah of Violence: The Background to the Aceh Problem, ed. Anthony Reid (Singapore: Singapore University Press, 2006), 38–51. (Call no. RSING 959.81 VER)

Raden Hoesein Djajadiningrat, Kesultanan Aceh: (Suatu Pembahasan Atas Bahan-Bahan Yang Tertera Dalam Karya Melayu Tentang Sejarah Kesultanan Aceh), trans. Teuku Hamild (Banda Aceh: Proyek Rehabilitisi dan Perluasan Museum Daerah Istimewa Aceh, 1979). (Call no. RUR RSEA 959.801 DJA)

Richard Winstedt and Y. A. Talib, ed., A History of Classical Malay Literature (Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society., 1989). (Call no. RSEA 899.2302 WIN)

S. White, “Gender and the Family,” in Voices of Islam in Southeast Asia: A Contemporary Sourcebook, ed. Greg Fealy and Virginia Hooker (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2006), 273–74. (Call no. RSING 297.0959 VOI)

Shelly Errington, “Recasting Sex, Gender and Power: A Theoretical and Regional Overview,” in Power and Difference: Gender in Island Southeast Asia, ed. Jane Monnig Atkinson and Shelly Errington (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990), 1–58. (Call no. RSING 305.30959 POW)

Snouck Hurgronje C., The Achehnese, trans. A.W.S. O’Sullivan, 1 (Holland: E.J. Brill, 1906). (Call no.: RCLOS 959.81 SNO)

Susan Blackburn, “Introduction,” in Indonesian Islam in a New Era: How Women Negotiate Their Muslim Identities, ed. Susan Blackburn, Bianca J. Smith and Siti Syamsiyatun (Clayton: Monash Asia Institute Press, 2008), 1–21. (Call no. RSEA 305.4869709598 IND)

Syafiq Hasyim, Understanding Women in Islam: An Indonesian Perspective (International Center for Islam and Pluralism, 2006). (Call no. RSEA 305.409598 HAS)

Tabitha Frith, Constructing Malay Muslim Womanhood in Malaysia (Australia: Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, 2002). (Call no. RSEA 305.486971 FRI)

Takeshi Ito, “Why Did Nuruddin Ar-Raniri Leave Aceh in 1054 A.H?” Bijdragen tot deTaal-, Land-en Volkenkunde 134, no. 4 (1978), 489–91. (From JSTOR via NLB’s eResources website)

Teuku Iskandar, Hikayat Aceh (Kuala Lumpur: Yayasan Karyawan, 2001). (Call no. Malay R 959.81 ISK)

The Ship of Sulaiman, trans. John O’Kane (London: Routledge, 1972). (Call no. RSEA 959.302 SHI)

Thomas Bowrey and Richard Carnac Temple, eds., A Geographical Account of Countries Round the Bay of Bengal, 1669 to 1679 (Cambridge: Printed for the Hakluyt Society, 1905). (Call no. RRARE 915.4 BOW; accession no. B29265182B)

Tome Pires, The Suma Oriental of Tome Pires and the Book of Francisco Rodrigues, Rutter of a Voyage in the Red Sea, Nautical Rules, Almanack and Maps, Written and Drawn in the East Before 1515. Translated From the Portuguese Ms in the Bibliothèque de la Chambre Des Députés, Paris, and Edited by Armando Cortesão (London, Hakluyt Society, 1944). (Call no. RRARE 910.8 HAK; microfilm NL14208 (vol. 1); NL26012 (vol. 2))

Wazir Jahan Karim, Women and Culture: Between Malay Adat and Islam (Colo: Westview Press, 1992). (Call no. RSEA 305.309595 WAZ)

William Foster, The Voyages of Sir James Lancaster to Brazil and the East Indies, 1591– 1603 (London: Printed for the Hakluyt Society, 1940). (Call no. RCLOS 910.8 HAK–[RFL])

NOTES